reflectivepundit

Can America’s Democracy Survive the Onslaught by Trump and his Henchmen? Will the Press Act as Guardian of Democracy?

By Brigitte L. Nacos

Shamelessly like autocratic rulers at all times President Trump spelled out what he had alluded to for some time: If his opponent Joe Biden wins the election, Mr. Trump will not leave office peacefully. Worse yet, he and his henchmen are now plotting a scheme that is to assure Trump’s victory as The Atlantic reported. Asked yesterday during a news briefing whether he would commit to a peaceful transfer of power [in case he would lose the election], Mr. Trump answered, “Get rid of the ballots, and you’ll have a very — we’ll have a very peaceful, there won’t be a transfer, frankly. There’ll be a continuation.”  

In other words, 40 days before election day Donald Trump America and the world that he will remain U.S. president regardless of the election results. That is what happens in dictatorships, not in democracies. But during Trump’s presidency the rules of the games have already tilted in favor of raw presidential power.

To disregard Trump’s statements as just words would be a grave mistake. Especially when coming out of the mouths of the powerful, words matter; they tend to be followed by deeds.  

Like other autocrats, Trump signals his misdeeds by tweets or public statements. Thus, he makes no secret of the reason behind his rush to appoint and seat a replacement for Justice Bader Ginsberg: He wants a full Supreme Court dominated by GOP appointed conservatives in place to rule in his favor in case of a post-election dispute.

For more than 200 years, no sitting U.S. president declared upcoming elections to be illegitimate and refused to promise a peaceful change of power in case of defeat. It took the worst president in American history to throw his nation into an existential crisis of democracy.

The issue is no longer whether Republicans or Democrats win next month’s election, the issue is whether American democracy survives the already raging onslaught by an autocratic showman and his equally ruthless supporting cast.

Since there is little hope that other Republican leaders join Senator Mitt Romney in rejecting Trump’s power play, the leading media organizations may be the last hope to act as guardians of our democracy.

But that would take an agreement to report Trump’s threat to democracy day-in and day-out as most important news. It would mean for the press not to be distracted by Trump’s daily or even hourly launched rhetorical bombs that are minor in comparison to the existential danger. It would also mean that the failures of this presidency are highlighted every day, again and again.

Especially with respect to the Covid-19 pandemic. The president ignores the more than 200,000 Americans who died so far—more than half of them because of his mismanagement and his diabolical political calculations early on that states with Democratic majorities were mostly affected by the deadly disease.

It would mean for the press to remind the public that at this point the number of coronavirus victims is 70times higher than the number of those killed during the 9/11 attacks. Osama bin Laden, in charge of those the horrific 9/11 incidents, was called here and elsewhere in the West “evil-doer.”

I have spent much times and effort to research the central role of publicity and propaganda in terrorism and argued consistently that over-covering might well encourage more such political violence.

Concerning the coverage of President Trump now, I argue similarly that the news media must refrain from over-covering him and from reporting every aggressive and nasty word he speaks and tweets.

Instead, the news media must stick to the only matter that counts now: Most prominently reported and placed news and commentary about the existential calamity Americans faces—and must resist.

Autocratic Demagogues of the Past and Donald Trump

By Brigitte L. Nacos

For the last several weeks I minimized my news consumption and instead took time out to read brand new books and reread classics in search for food of thought as I struggled to make sense of the senseless politics and policies of Donald Trump. While I may not have succeeded to understand the narcissistic 45^th U.S. President fully, I found similarities between Trump’s and other authoritarian demagogues’ character traits.

Describing Adolf Hitler’s personality during his downfall from power, Volker Ullrich writes in his recently published second volume of his Hitler biography (Hitler: Downfall 1939-1945),

“Several of his character traits had become even more pronounced: his egocentrism, his inability to self-criticize, and his commensurate tendency to overestimate himself, his lack of scruples when choosing means to his ends, his habit of betting everything on a single card, his contempt for others and his lack of empathy.”    

This short description of Hitler’s distinct personality disorders matches Trump’s moral deficits and his disparaging rhetoric and harmful behavior perfectly. While it is well documented that Mr. Trump is a pathological liar, nothing displays his lack of public truthfulness more shockingly than the just publicized textual and audio-taped excerpts from Bob Woodward’s forthcoming book Rage.

We hear Trump’s voice as he tells Woodward in January and February and March that he was fully informed of and understood the deadly Covid-19 threat but underplayed it publicly to avoid panic. In public, he actually denied the threat, called it hoax—the Democrat’s hoax.

The President, as always, must have figured –and still does--that he knows everything better than the best experts, whether the generals or his own administration’s public health experts that are globally known as leaders in their field. He threatened and silenced those experts who stepped forth and told the truth. Instead, he recommended harmful disinfectants and unproven the hydroxychloroquine medicine to counter the virus.  

This squares with Hitler’s egocentrism, genius complex, and contempt for others. Hitler aimed to be the heroic builder of a Thousand Year Reich; Trump aims to be recognized by historians as the greatest president since Lincoln—or the greatest president ever.

Since yesterday, I have heard many talking heads bemoaning Trump’s failure to tell the American public the truth about the Covid-19 threat as early as he knew it. Of course, I agree.  He should have used every one of his press conferences to promote face masks, social distancing, and frequent washing of hands. Instead he politicized face masks by not wearing one, holding mass rallies, and praising armed militias who threatened state governments for Covid-19 measures.

But words must be accompanied by deeds. And here Donald Trump’s complete failure contributed significantly to the high number of infections and the horrific number of deaths—more than 190,000 today. The President rejected from the outset the detailed plan for managing a virus pandemic established during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations. Although he knew of the highly infectious and deadly nature of Covid-19 according to the Woodward tapes, he refused to immediately order the massive and speedy production of personal protective equipment (PPE) for the medical community, testing kits, masks for the general population.