by David Epstein
My fellow Americans, our long national nightmare is over. Alberto Gonzales has --- at long last, and somewhat surprisingly --- resigned.
The analogy to Watergate is apt; not since Nixon has the executive branch done so much damage to the Constitution. But historians will have a hard time, I predict, determining whether Gonzales did more damage with the policies he promoted, as opposed to his spectacular mismanagement of the Justice Department, which has now been gutted of many of its skilled, dedicated employees, to be replaced by partisan hacks. Gonzo, you did a heck of a job.
The timing is a bit curious, too. Is this Gonzales's version of leaving on his own terms? Rove wouldn't resign after the 2006 elections; he gutted it out for another half a year in order to prove that no one was forcing him out. (On the other hand, this had a price: the fact that his leaving was treated as a bit of a non-event just underscored how irrelevant he had become in the interim. Better, I think, to leave at the zenith of your unpopularity than to slink away as a diminished former-someone.) Perhaps Gonzales didn't want to leave right after one of his so-horrible-it's-(almost)-funny testimonies before Congress, but before he was actually impeached or indicted for perjury. (And if he really did commit perjury, that investigation should continue, but of course it won't.)
So, what's next for his former eminence? He's still a close Bush friend, of course, which would indicate at least a cushy lobbying job or a high-end law firm in Texas. But he might have made himself radioactive by agreeing to wash the administration's dirty laundry for so long. Perhaps the Hoover Institution needs another senior scholar....
As for the timing of Gonzales' resignation, I heard (via a NY Times article) that there has been some speculation that perhaps the Bush administration itself pushed him out, something I find odd indeed. A person's reputation doesn't seem to be a big concern to this administration as Karl Rove shows us. It makes me wonder, if the NY Times article is true, about the administration trying to cover something up. It wouldn't be the first time.
The article: http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/28/washington/28resign.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&oref=slogin&adxnnlx=1188506150-60Qvkc51RUrmN2/tXij9FQ
Posted by: xyz | August 30, 2007 at 04:36 PM
I agree on Guantanamo -- the deprivation of basic liberties, even to American citizens, will be seen as a low point in our nation's history for generations to come.
Posted by: davidepstein | August 28, 2007 at 10:15 AM
Gitmo justice for Goneso. Fly his eminence down to Guantanamo on one of those CIA jets while we 'decide' on his status. He claims to know little about his organization and he cannot remember key events in his recent past. Our tax dollars have been buying the most effective interrogation techniques including psychological and deprivation torture and I think they would be well spent on Gonzales to assist in sharpening his memory. After he gets all cleared up he can tell how to clean up the Guantanamo mess which his directives created. After that, NSA, Verizon, Comcast, and his family will be obligated to surveil his activities while his interminable undecided status remains undecided. Thanks to his patriotic contributions, the damage to our constitution and world standing will not soon be gone.
Posted by: Patrick | August 28, 2007 at 09:22 AM
As long as he isn't replaced by John "it-ain't-torture" Yoo, we'll experience a self correction. But GWB still has WMDs left, Cheney, Laura, and his revamped SCOTUS
Posted by: Tony | August 27, 2007 at 06:32 PM