« President Karzai’s Plea for Female Hostages Only: What about the Male Captives? | Main | “Bush’s Brain” Quits: What Next for Karl Rove, the White House, and the GOP? »

August 10, 2007



Tony: I doubt that Gonzales and congressional Democrats had different surveillance programs in mind--but even if this was the case, in the firing of U.S. attorneys, G. was not telling all he knew about the case.
One way or the other, I agree with you that Democrats cannot have it both ways--telling us that G. is actually not telling the truth and perhaps impeachable on the one hand and yet expanding his surveillance power on the other.

Tony Facade

it is "possible" that Gonz was referring to a slightly different surveillance program than congressional questioners were. We don't have enough info, and we never will. My biggest problem with this is that the Dems were trying to remove G from office, and voted to increase the very powers they were ?ing him about. I'm going Libertarian.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2006