« Beyond Gaza and the West Bank: When Masked Gunmen Terrorize | Main | What is the real strength of al-Qaeda in Iraq? »

June 19, 2007



Hi !!!
There was merrily!
The Good lad an author! I much like site!


Very interesting site ! Good work ! Congratulations :)


How typically liberal.

If he was on the panel - you'd say he was there for political reasons.

Since he's not on the pane - you say he should have been....

but your reasoning is that he should have been on the panel....FOR POLITICAL REASONS!

The argument made is that he should have been on the panel because he, "would have had a unique chance to educate himself on the dismal situation in Iraq and the problems plaguing the whole region."

Those on the panel included:
2 Former Secretaries of State, 3 former members of congress, 2 former Presidential advisors, a former attorney general, a former Supreme Court Justice, and a former Secretary of Defense.

And liberals are now complaining because a former city mayor wasn't on the panel? Give me a break.

If he had been - you'd have clamored that someone on the left, like John Edwards or Al Gore - someone with political aspirations, be given the same opportunity to serve on the panel to avoid giving Rudy a 'leg-up' on 2008.

Hypocrites all - on the left.


Thank goodness Fooliani is being exposed! LIVEWIRE predicts Ghouliani is not getting the nomination- he is an egomaniac opportunist DICKtator who has milked 911 for millions with his speaking fees. Any monkey could've acted tough and brave during 911; RON PAUL is the true hero!

The comments to this entry are closed.

Never miss a post
Your email address:*
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide
Blog powered by Typepad
Member since 03/2006