By Brigitte L. Nacos
The other day, an
article by Heather Havrilesky and Rebecca Traister in Salon
started with the following observation: “You can avert your eyes, cover your
ears, change the channel and close your browser, but you can't escape the
truth: Paris Hilton has become an omnipresent cultural icon, a symbol of the
depravity of our times, and thanks to Friday's sobbing, O.J.-level arrest
spectacle, she's destined to remain at the forefront of that rushing flow of
global news until we're all old and gray.” Unfortunately, Havrilesky and
Traister are right as is Nora
Efron who closes the Huffington Post column “I love Paris” with the
assurance at Paris Hilton is not going away—“We'll always have Paris.” Unfortunately, Ann Coulter and Anna Nicole
Smith and Princess Diana and other media celebrities—however irrelevant they may
be—will not go away either. Once promoted by the corporate media as
celebrities, they receive more airtime than bloody wars, illegal immigration,
health care problems, crises in education, climate change, or any other serious
public affairs issues. Dead or alive—media celebrities get preferential
treatment.
Take the media’s attention to far-right columnist and author Ann Coulter whose hate speech should disqualify her as a frequent source and guest of broadcast programs and print media. Yet, she remains the darling of media figures—especially those who strive for celebrity status themselves. Take Chris Matthews of “Hardball” who provided Coulter once again with a stage on his show and obviously arranged for Elizabeth Edwards to call in to confront Coulter and her put-downs of presidential candidate John Edwards. The polite Elizabeth Edwards was no match for the aggressive big mouth Coulter. But Matthews got what he and his kind strive for: confrontation, conflict, attacks, insults—not the civilized public discourse that Mrs. Edwards pleaded for.
A day earlier, Chris Cuomo interviewed Coulter at length on “Good Morning America” where she compared President Bush’s performance in the “war on terrorism” with President Franklin Roosevelt’s in World War II saying of Bush, “I do think what he's done in the war on terrorism remains spectacular…” But she also said that on domestic policy “Bush has been an embarrassment”—for example, with respect to the immigration issue. And in that context she remarked that ”Bush really is a uniter because we're all just waiting for this nincompoop to be gone. I think we all finally are on the same page on that.” This sentence—pretty much removed from whatever else she said-- earned her the lead-in in Tuesday’s column by the Washington Post’s media columnist Howard Kurtz.
As for the “Good Morning America” appearance, it was a promotion for Coulter’s latest book. Cuomo announced at the outset that the paperback version of “Godless: the Church of Liberalism's” is now available. This was the exchange at the end of the segment:
CUOMO: Ann Coulter, always appreciate having you in the chair.
COULTER: Thank you. Great to be here.
CUOMO: Thank you for coming. To read an excerpt from Ann Coulter's book, go to our website at ABCNews.com.
That’s how the mainstream media cover irrelevant media celebrities—and at the expense of real news.
I must admit, the one who wrote nishtyak nakropal.
http://interest-site.ru
Posted by: Wrotteguago | January 21, 2010 at 04:19 AM
Hello everyone. The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them. Help me! Help to find sites on the: Anti asthma. I found only this - prednisolone for bodybuilding. Mind it, that one should not consume it if allergic towards ragweed. Right article free and quality content for your websites and ezines. Best regards :-(, Kato from Fiji.
Posted by: Kato | June 01, 2009 at 01:21 PM
the more I see happening in this country in the way of truths not being told, the more I'm reminded Of Orwell's 1984. they spoon-feed us irrelevant stories all the while taking away what truth we have. Remember the patriot act? I don't like it that my phone could possible be tapped for no reason and I really don't see how Wicca can be associated with terrorism, yet wicca books were taken from the libraries under that act.
Posted by: Other One | March 26, 2008 at 10:19 AM
Tiffany: You certainly have a point: Unless news consumer demand serious public affairs news and consume infotainment, the status quo and worse will prevail.
Posted by: Brigitte | July 11, 2007 at 08:42 PM
Unfortunately, celebrity "news" is what gets the attention of the average American. However, I wonder if the media is just supplying our demand for worthless gossip that appeals to our emotions, or strategically distracting us from the real issues. I hope it's a combination of both, but knowing the bureaucracy in mass media, too much shaping is going on.
Posted by: Tiffany Jeltema | July 10, 2007 at 09:46 PM
Excellent post! It's very disappointing that Chris Matthews allowed Ann Coulter on Hardball last week. Matthews even led off with a story on Paris a week or so before. I thought he would be the one to stick to real news when others in MSM turned tabloid, but I guess not.
Posted by: Shawn | June 30, 2007 at 10:34 PM