By Brigitte L. Nacos
The rhetorical battle between Fox News anchor Chris Wallace and former President Bill Clinton last weekend was the stuff the news media strives on. But as I read about the clash in the Washington Post’s “Media Notes” column by Howard Kurtz, I found another aspect far more interesting, namely, the way Kurtz refers to and deals with the perennial issue of whether there is conservative or liberal media bias—or whether the media are fair and balanced. In the context of the Wallace-Clinton quarrel, Kurtz writes, “Fox, which employs a number of high profile conservative hosts, maintains that its reporting is straightforward but is viewed by many liberals and other critics as leaning toward the right.” Careful not to take a stand beyond saying that Fox News does have a number of conservative hosts, Kurtz points to the networks’ official position before mentioning the different views of “liberals” and “other critics,” whose ideological preferences are not revealed.
Further down in his column, Kurtz devotes some paragraphs to former Washington Post political reporter Thomas Edsall who told a conservative radio host that the "mainstream media presents itself as unbiased, when in fact there are built into it many biases, and they are overwhelmingly to the left." This should assure him a large audience for his just published new book. According to Kurtz, Edsall believes that reporters vote Democratic by somewhere between 15 to 1 and 25 to 1. Shouldn't the reader know whether these estimates are in the ball park?
Comments