Collaborative Space

RSS Subscriptions

Add
to netvibes

Add to
Google

Subscribe in
NewsGator Online

« What is the real strength of al-Qaeda in Iraq? | Main | What is the Life of an Innocent Iraqi or Afghan Worth? »

Mainstream Media’s Obsession with Irrelevant Media Celebrities

By Brigitte L. Nacos
The other day,  an article by Heather Havrilesky and Rebecca Traister in Salon started with the following observation: “You can avert your eyes, cover your ears, change the channel and close your browser, but you can't escape the truth: Paris Hilton has become an omnipresent cultural icon, a symbol of the depravity of our times, and thanks to Friday's sobbing, O.J.-level arrest spectacle, she's destined to remain at the forefront of that rushing flow of global news until we're all old and gray.” Unfortunately, Havrilesky and Traister are right as is Nora Efron who closes the Huffington Post column “I love Paris” with the assurance at Paris Hilton is not going away—“We'll always have Paris.” Unfortunately, Ann Coulter and Anna Nicole Smith and Princess Diana and other media celebrities—however irrelevant they may be—will not go away either. Once promoted by the corporate media as celebrities, they receive more airtime than bloody wars, illegal immigration, health care problems, crises in education, climate change, or any other serious public affairs issues. Dead or alive—media celebrities get preferential treatment.

Take the media’s attention to far-right columnist and author Ann Coulter whose hate speech should disqualify her as a frequent source and guest of broadcast programs and print media. Yet, she remains the darling of media figures—especially those who strive for celebrity status themselves. Take Chris Matthews of “Hardball” who provided Coulter once again with a stage on his show and obviously arranged for Elizabeth Edwards to call in to confront Coulter and her put-downs of presidential candidate John Edwards. The polite Elizabeth Edwards was no match for the aggressive big mouth Coulter. But Matthews got what he and his kind strive for: confrontation, conflict, attacks, insults—not the civilized public discourse that Mrs. Edwards pleaded for.

A day earlier, Chris Cuomo interviewed Coulter at length on “Good Morning America” where she compared President Bush’s performance in the “war on terrorism” with President Franklin Roosevelt’s in World War II saying of Bush, “I do think what he's done in the war on terrorism remains spectacular…” But she also said that on domestic policy “Bush has been an embarrassment”—for example, with respect to the immigration issue. And in that context she remarked that ”Bush really is a uniter because we're all just waiting for this nincompoop to be gone. I think we all finally are on the same page on that.” This sentence—pretty much removed from whatever else she said-- earned her the lead-in in Tuesday’s column by the Washington Post’s media columnist Howard Kurtz.

As for the “Good Morning America” appearance, it was a promotion for Coulter’s latest book. Cuomo announced at the outset that the paperback version of “Godless: the Church of Liberalism's” is now available. This was the exchange at the end of the segment:

CUOMO: Ann Coulter, always appreciate having you in the chair.

COULTER: Thank you. Great to be here.

CUOMO: Thank you for coming. To read an excerpt from Ann Coulter's book, go to our website at ABCNews.com.

That’s how the mainstream media cover irrelevant media celebrities—and at the expense of real news.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341ca8e553ef00e008cdd2658834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Mainstream Media’s Obsession with Irrelevant Media Celebrities :

Comments

Excellent post! It's very disappointing that Chris Matthews allowed Ann Coulter on Hardball last week. Matthews even led off with a story on Paris a week or so before. I thought he would be the one to stick to real news when others in MSM turned tabloid, but I guess not.

Unfortunately, celebrity "news" is what gets the attention of the average American. However, I wonder if the media is just supplying our demand for worthless gossip that appeals to our emotions, or strategically distracting us from the real issues. I hope it's a combination of both, but knowing the bureaucracy in mass media, too much shaping is going on.

Tiffany: You certainly have a point: Unless news consumer demand serious public affairs news and consume infotainment, the status quo and worse will prevail.

the more I see happening in this country in the way of truths not being told, the more I'm reminded Of Orwell's 1984. they spoon-feed us irrelevant stories all the while taking away what truth we have. Remember the patriot act? I don't like it that my phone could possible be tapped for no reason and I really don't see how Wicca can be associated with terrorism, yet wicca books were taken from the libraries under that act.

Hello everyone. The radical of one century is the conservative of the next. The radical invents the views. When he has worn them out the conservative adopts them. Help me! Help to find sites on the: Anti asthma. I found only this - prednisolone for bodybuilding. Mind it, that one should not consume it if allergic towards ragweed. Right article free and quality content for your websites and ezines. Best regards :-(, Kato from Fiji.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Advertisements


Email Subscription

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Newspapers

Other Columbia Blogs

Other Links



Blog powered by TypePad